Ciclosporin + Calcium-channel blockers - Drug Interactions

Diltiazem,nicardipine and verapamil markedly raise serumciclosporin levels but also appear to possess kidney protective effects. A single case describes elevated ciclosporin levels caused bynisoldipine. Nifedipine normally appears not to interact,but risesand falls in ciclosporin levels have been seen in a few patients. Felodipine,isradipine, lacidipine and nitrendipine normally appearnot to raise serum ciclosporin levels. Amlodipine has modestlyincreased ciclosporin levels in some studies,but not in others, andit may also have kidney-protective properties.

Ten hypertensive patients with kidney transplants taking ciclosporin (3 of them also taking azathioprine) were also given amlodipine 5 to 10mg daily for 4 weeks. The hypertension was well controlled, drug well tolerated, and pharmacokinetics of ciclosporin remained unaltered (See reference number 1). However, another study in 11 hypertensive kidney transplant patients found that amlodipine, given for 7 weeks, raised ciclosporin levels by an average of 40%, without affecting creatinine levels (See reference number 2). A review identified two other studies that have found increases in ciclosporin levels of 23 % and 43 % with amlodipine,whereas four studies have found no change (See reference number 3). Amlodipine is reported to reduce ciclosporin-associated nephrotoxicity in a study in patients with psoriasis,(See reference number 4)and in a review of kidney-transplant recipients (See reference number 3).

A pharmacokinetic study in 9 patients taking ciclosporin found that addition of diltiazem 180mg daily increased trough blood level, maximum blood level and half-life of ciclosporin by 112%, 37%, and 43%, respectively (See reference number 5). Sixty-five kidney transplant patients taking ciclosporin and diltiazem were found to need less ciclosporin when compared with 63 control patients not given diltiazem (7.3 mg/kg daily compared with 9 mg/kg daily). There were considerable individual differences in dose requirements (See reference number 6). Other studies clearly confirm that diltiazem can raise ciclosporin blood levels (See reference number 7-32). In some cases ciclosporin blood levels were not only controlled by reducing ciclosporin dosage by 30 to 60%, but it appeared that diltiazem had a kidney protective role (reduced nephrotoxicity, fewer rejection episodes and haemodialysis sessions) (See reference number 11,22,33-37). Another study found that a reduction in ciclosporin dose of about 21 % was required for both men and women during chronic administration of diltiazem 90mg twice daily, despite reports of higher activity of cytochrome P450 isoenzyme CYP3A4 in women than in men (See reference number 38).

Thirteen kidney transplant patients had no significant changes in their serum ciclosporin levels when they took felodipine 2.5 to 10mg daily and serum creatinine levels were also unchanged. Mean blood pressures fell from 161/100 to 152/90 mmHg (See reference number 39). Another study found no significant changes in ciclosporin levels in patients also given felodipine (See reference number 40). A single 10mg dose of felodipine was found to have beneficial effects on blood pressure,renal haemodynamics, renal tubular sodium and water handling in ciclosporin-treated kidney transplant patients. The effects of long-term use were not studied (See reference number 41). A single-dose study in 12 healthy subjects found that maximum serum levels of ciclosporin 5 mg/kg were slightly raised by 16 % by felodipine 10 mg, while AUC and maximum plasma level of felodipine were raised by 58 % and 151%, respectively, but blood pressures were unchanged (See reference number 42). The same group of workers also briefly described acute and short-term studies in groups of kidney transplant and dermatological patients,which found that felodipine 5 to 10mg reduced blood pressure and opposed ciclosporin nephrotoxicity (See reference number 43). A study in heart transplant patients taking ciclosporin found that felodipine attenuated hypertrophic effects of ciclosporin on transplanted hearts (See reference number 44).

Ten kidney transplant patients taking ciclosporin,prednisone and azathioprine started taking lacidipine 4mg daily. A very small increase in trough blood levels (6%) and AUC (14%) of ciclosporin occurred. The blood pressures fell from 142/93 to 125/79 mmHg, and 14-hour urinary output rose from 1401 to 2050 mL (See reference number 49).

The manufacturers of lercanidipine contraindicate concurrent use of ciclosporin as plasma levels of lercanidipine were raised threefold by ciclosporin, and ciclosporin AUC was raised by 21 % by lercanidipine (See reference number 50).

Nicardipine 20mg three times daily raised ciclosporin blood levels in 9 patients by 110 % (from 226 to 430 nanograms/mL, range 24 to 341%). Their serum creatinine concentrations rose from 136 to 147 micromol/L (See reference number 51).

Other studies have found increases in serum ciclosporin levels,in some cases as much as two to threefold, when nicardipine was given (See reference number 52-58).

Five of 9 patients who had an interaction with nicardipine (see above) had no interaction when they were given nifedipine (See reference number 51). No changes in ciclosporin levels were seen in other studies,(See reference number 36,59-63) but raised(See reference number 17,20) and reduced levels(See reference number 64)have been reported in others. Two studies found that nifedipine appeared to protect patients against nephrotoxicity of ciclosporin (See reference number 65,66). However, there is some evidence that adverse effects of nifedipine such as flushing, rash(See reference number 67) and gingival overgrowth may be increased (See reference number 68-71). However, another study in 121 renal transplant patients found prevalence of gingival overgrowth in patients taking ciclosporin was increased (but not to a statistically significant extent) by concurrent use of calcium-channel blockers (not specified) (See reference number 72).

A 46-year-old man taking azathioprine,prednisolone and ciclosporin after a kidney transplant 18 months previously was given nisoldipine 5mg twice daily. During following month his ciclosporin levels rose from a range of 100 to 150 micrograms/L up to 200 micrograms/L and an increase in serum creatinine levels occurred. His ciclosporin dose was gradually reduced from 325 to 250mg daily, and his ciclosporin and creatinine levels returned to acceptable range (See reference number 73).

Nitrendipine 20mg daily for 3 weeks had no significant effect on ciclosporin blood levels in 16 kidney transplant patients (See reference number 74)

Twenty-two kidney transplant patients given ciclosporin and verapamil had ciclosporin blood levels that were 50 to 70 % higher than in 18 other patients not given verapamil,despite similar ciclosporin doses in both groups. Serum creatinine levels were lower in those taking verapamil. Moreover, only 3 of 22 had rejection episodes within 4 weeks compared with 10 out of 18 not given verapamil (See reference number 75).

Other studies have found that verapamil 120 to 320mg daily can increase,double or even triple ciclosporin blood levels in individual patients with kidney or heart transplants (See reference number 24,40,62,64,76-80). Combined use does not apparently increase severity or prevalence of gingival overgrowth caused by ciclosporin (See reference number 81).

The increased ciclosporin levels are largely due to calcium-channel blockers inhibiting ciclosporin metabolism by cytochrome P450 isoenzyme CYP3A4 in liver. Note that, of calcium-channel blockers, diltiazem and verapamil are strongest CYP3A4 inhibitors (see Calcium-channel blockers, ). Diltiazem also appears to reduce ischaemia-induced renal tubular necrosis (See reference number 82). Other calcium-channel blockers also seem to have a kidney-protective effect. The raised felodipine levels are possibly due to competitive inhibition by ciclosporin of intestinal and liver metabolism,or changes in P-glycoprotein activity.

The interactions of ciclosporin with diltiazem,nicardipine and verapamil are established and relatively well documented. Concurrent use need not be avoided,but ciclosporin levels should be well monitored and dosage reductions made as necessary. Even though ciclosporin blood levels are increased,these calcium-channel blockers appear to have a kidney-protective effect. One study(See reference number 83) noted that, although calcium-channel blockers increase ciclosporin blood levels, this is of no harm to patient, since no changes in renal function were observed. With diltiazem and verapamil ciclosporin dosage can apparently be reduced by about 25 to 50 % and possibly more with nicardipine. One case suggests that this is also true with nisoldipine. Several studies suggest that substantial cost savings can be made by combining either diltiazem(See reference number 13,84,85) or verapamil(See reference number 24) with ciclosporin. Take care not to substitute one diltiazem product for another after patient has been stabilised because there is evidence that their bioequivalence differences may alter extent of interaction (See reference number 27,86). Concurrent use with lercanidipine is contraindicated by manufacturers (See reference number 50).

The situation with amlodipine is also uncertain,but isradipine, lacidipine and nitrendipine appear to be non-interacting alternatives. Many of calcium channel blockers have a kidney-protective effect.

Toupance O,Lavaud S, Canivet E, Bernaud C, Hotton J-M, Chanard J. Antihypertensive effect of amlodipine and lack of interference with cyclosporine metabolism in renal transplantrecipients. Hypertension (1994) 24, 297–300.

Pesavento TE,Jones PA, Julian BA, Curtis JJ. Amlodipine increases cyclosporine levels inhypertensive renal transplant patients: results of a prospective study. J Am Soc Nephrol (1996) 7, 831–5.

Schrama YC,Koomans HA. Interactions of cyclosporin A and amlodipine: blood cyclosporinA levels, hypertension and kidney function. J Hypertens (1998) 16 (Suppl 4), S33–S38.

Raman GV,Campbell SK, Farrer A, Albano JDM, Cook J. Modifying effects of amlodipineon cyclosporin A-induced changes in renal function in patients with psoriasis. J Hypertens (1998) 16 (Suppl 4), S39–S41.

Foradori A,Mezzano S, Videla C, Pefaur J, Elberg A. Modification of the pharmacokineticsof cyclosporine A and metabolites by the concomitant use of Neoral and diltiazem or ketoconazole in stable adult kidney transplants. Transplant Proc (1998) 30, 1685–7.

Kohlhaw K,Wonigeit K, Frei U, Oldhafer K, Neumann K, Pichlmayr R. Effect of calciumchannel blocker diltiazem on cyclosporine A blood levels and dose requirements. Transplant Proc (1988) 20 (Suppl 2), 572–4.

Pochet JM,Pirson Y. Cyclosporin-diltiazem interaction. Lancet (1986) i, 979.

Griño JM,Sabate I, Castelao AM, Alsina J. Influence of diltiazem on cyclosporin clearance.Lancet (1986) i, 1387.

Kunzendorf U,Walz G, Neumayer H-H, Wagner K, Keller F, Offermann G. Einfluss vonDiltiazem auf die Ciclosporin-Blutspiegel. Klin Wochenschr (1987) 65, 1101–3.

Sabaté I,Griñó JM, Castelao AM, Huguet J, Serón D, Blanco A. Cyclosporin-diltiazem interaction: comparison of cyclosporin levels measured with two monoclonal antibodies.Transplant Proc (1989) 21, 1460–1.

Choi KC,Kang YJ, Kim SK, Ryu SB. Effects of the calcium channel blocker diltiazem onthe blood and serum levels of cyclosporin A. Chonnam J Med Sci (1989) 2, 131–6.

Campistol JM,Oppenheimer F, Vilardell J, Ricart MJ, Alcaraz A, Ponz E, Andreu J. Interaction between ciclosporin and diltiazem in renal transplant patients. Nephron (1991) 57, 241–

2.

Valantine H,Keogh A, McIntosh N, Hunt S, Oyer P, Schroeder J. Cost containment-Coadministration of diltiazem with cyclosporine following cardiac transplant. J Heart Transplant (1990) 9, 68.

Bourge RC,Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Figg WD, White-Williams C, Ketchum C. Diltiazem-cyclosporine interaction in cardiac transplant recipients: impact on cyclosporine dose and medication costs. Am J Med (1991) 90, 402–4.

Maddux MS,Veremis SA, Bauma WD, Pollak R. Significant drug interactions with cyclosporine. Hosp Ther (1987) 12, 56–70.

Brockmöller J,Neumayer H-H, Wagner K, Weber W, Heinemeyer G, Kewitz H, Roots I.Pharmacokinetic interaction between cyclosporin and diltiazem. Eur J Clin Pharmacol (1990) 38, 237–42.

Diaz C,Gillum DM. Interaction of diltiazem and nifedipine with cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients. Kidney Int (1989) 35, 513.

Wagner K,Albrecht S, Neumayer H-H. Prevention of posttransplant acute tubular necrosisby the calcium antagonist diltiazem: a prospective randomized study. Am J Nephrol (1987) 7, 287–91.

McCauley J,Ptachcinski RJ, Shapiro R. The cyclosporine-sparing effects of diltiazem in renal transplantation. Transplant Proc (1989) 21, 3955–7.

Castelao AM. Cyclosporine A – drug interactions. 2nd Int Conf Therapeutic Drug MonitoringToxicology,Barcelona, Spain, 1992. 203–9.

Shennib H,Auger J-L. Diltiazem improves cyclosporine dosage in cystic fibrosis lung transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant (1994) 13, 292–6.

Macdonald P,Keogh A, Connell J, Harvison A, Richens D, Spratt P. Diltiazem co-administration reduces cylosporine toxicity after heart transplantation: a prospective randomisedstudy. Transplant Proc (1992) 24, 2259–62.

Masri MA,Shakuntala V, Shanwaz M, Zaher M, Dhawan I, Yasin I, Pingle A. Pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine in renal transplant patients on diltiazem. Transplant Proc (1994) 26, 1921.

Sketris IS,Methot ME, Nicol D, Belitsky P, Knox MG. Effect of calcium-channel blockerson cyclosporine clearance and use in renal transplant patients. Ann Pharmacother (1994) 28, 1227–31.

Bleck JS,Thiesemann C, Kliem V, Christians U, Hecker H, Repp H, Frei U, Westhoff-BleckM, Manns M, Sewing KF. Diltiazem increases blood concentrations of cyclized cyclosporinemetabolites resulting in different cyclosporine metabolite patterns in stable male and femalerenal allograft recipients. Br J Clin Pharmacol (1996) 41, 551–6.

Morris RG,Jones TE. Diltiazem disposition and metabolism in recipients of renal transplants.Ther Drug Monit (1998) 20, 365–70.

Jones TE,Morris RG, Mathew TH. Formulation of diltiazem affects cyclosporin-sparing activity. Eur J Clin Pharmacol (1997) 52, 55–8.

Jones TE,Morris RG, Mathew TH. Diltiazem-cyclosporin pharmacokinetic interaction —dose-response relationship. Br J Clin Pharmacol (1997) 44, 499–504.

Sharma A,Bell L, Drolet D, Drouin E, Gaul M, Girardin P, Goodyer P, Schreiber R. Cyclosporine (CSA) Neoral kinetics in children treated with diltiazem. J Am Soc Nephrol (1996) 7, 1923.

Wagner C,Sperschneider H, Korn A, Christians U. Influence of diltiazem on cyclosporinemetabolites in renal graft recipients treated with Sandimmun:4.4pt; font-weight:normal; color:#000000″>(See reference number ®) and Neoral:4.4pt; font-weight:normal; color:#000000″>(See reference number ®). J Am Soc Nephrol (1997) 8, 707A.

Åsberg A,Christensen H, Hartmann A, Carlson E, Molden E, Berg KJ. Pharmacokinetic interactions between microemulsion formulated cyclosporine A and diltiazem in renal transplant recipients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol (1999) 55, 383–7.

Kumana CR,Tong MKL, Li C-S, Lauder IJ, Lee JSK, Kou M, Walley T, Haycox A, ChanTM. Diltiazem co-treatment in renal transplant patients receiving microemulsion cyclosporin. Br J Clin Pharmacol (2003) 56, 670–8.

Neumayer H-H,Wagner K. Diltiazem and economic use of cyclosporin. Lancet (1986) ii,

523.

Wagner K,Albrecht S, Neumayer H-H. Prevention of delayed graft function in cadaveric kidney transplantation by a calcium antagonist. Preliminary results of two prospective randomized trials. Transplant Proc (1986) 18, 510–15.

Wagner K,Albrecht S, Neumayer H-H. Prevention of delayed graft function by a calcium antagonist- a randomized trial in renal graft recipients on cyclosporine A. Transplant Proc (1986) 18, 1269–71.

Wagner K,Philipp T, Heinemeyer G, Brockmüller F, Roots I, Neumayer HH. Interaction ofcyclosporin and calcium antagonists. Transplant Proc (1989) 21, 1453–6.

Neumayer H-H,Kunzendorf U, Schreiber M. Protective effects of calcium antagonists in human renal transplantation. Kidney Int (1992) 41 (Suppl 36), S87–S93.

Aros CA,Ardiles LG, Schneider HO, Flores CA, Alruiz PA, Jerez VR, Mezzano SA. No gender-associated differences of cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in stable renal transplant patients treated with diltiazem. Transplant Proc (2005) 37, 3364–6.

Cohen DJ,Teng S-N, Valeri A, Appel GB. Influence of oral felodipine on serum cyclosporineconcentrations in renal transplant patients. J Am Soc Nephrol (1993) 4, 929.

Yildiz A,Sever MŞ, Türkmen A, Ecder T, Türk S, Akkaya V, Ark E. Interaction between cyclosporin A and verapamil, felodipine, and isradipine. Nephron (1999) 81, 117–18.

Pedersen EB,Sørensen SS, Eiskjær H, Skovbon H, Thomsen K. Interaction between cyclosporine and felodipine in renal transplant recipients. Kidney Int (1992) 41 (Suppl 36), S82– S86.

Madsen JK,Jensen JD, Jensen LW, Pedersen EB. Pharmacokinetic interaction between cyclosporine and the dihydropyridine calcium antagonist felodipine. Eur J Clin Pharmacol (1996) 50, 203–8.

Madsen JK,Kornerup HJ, Sørensen SS, Zachariae H, Pedersen EB. Ciclosporine nephrotoxicity can be counteracted by a calcium antagonist (felodipine) in acute and short-term studies.J Am Soc Nephrol (1995) 6, 1102.

Schwitter J,DeMarco T, Globits S, Sakuma H, Klinski C, Chatterjee K, Parmley WW, Higgins CB. Influence of felodipine on left ventricular hypertrophy and systolic function in orthoptic heart transplant recipients: possible interaction with cyclosporine medication. J Heart Lung Transplant (1999) 18, 1003–13.

Endresen L,Bergan S, Holdaas H, Pran T, Sinding-Larsen B, Berg KJ. Lack of effect of thecalcium antagonist isradipine on cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in renal transplant patients.Ther Drug Monit (1991) 13, 490–5.

Martinez F,Pirson Y, Wallemacq P, van Ypersele de Strihou C. No clinically significant interaction between ciclosporin and isradipine. Nephron (1991) 59, 658–9.

Vernillet L,Bourbigot B, Codet JP, Le Saux L, Moal MC, Morin JF. Lack of effect of isradipine on cyclosporin pharmacokinetics. Fundam Clin Pharmacol (1992) 6, 367–74.

Ahmed K,Michael B, Burke JF. Effects of isradipine on renal hemodynamics in renal transplant patients treated with cyclosporine. Clin Nephrol (1997) 48, 307–10.

Ruggenenti P,Perico N, Mosconi L, Gaspari F, Benigni A, Amuchastegui CS, Bruzzi I, Remuzzi G. Calcium channel blockers protect transplant patients from cyclosporine-induceddaily renal hypoperfusion. Kidney Int (1993) 43, 706–11.

Zanidip (Lercanidipine hydrochloride). Recordati Pharmaceuticals Ltd. UK Summary ofproduct characteristics,October 2004.

Bourbigot B,Guiserix J, Airiau J, Bressollette L, Morin JF, Cledes J. Nicardipine increasescyclosporin blood levels. Lancet (1986) i, 1447.

Cantarovich M,Hiesse C, Lockiec F, Charpentier B, Fries D. Confirmation of the interactionbetween cyclosporine and the calcium channel blocker nicardipine in renal transplant patients. Clin Nephrol (1987) 28, 190–3.

Kessler M,Renoult E, Jonon B, Vigneron B, Huu TC, Netter P. Interaction ciclosporine-nicardipine chez le transplanté rénal. Therapie (1987) 42, 273–5.

Deray G,Aupetit B, Martinez F, Baumelou A, Worcel A, Benhmida M, Legrand JC, Jacobs

C. Cyclosporin-nicardipine interaction. Am J Nephrol (1989) 9,349.

Kessler M,Netter P, Renoult E, Jonon B, Mur JM, Trechot P, Dousset B. Influence of nicardipine on renal function and plasma cyclosporin in renal transplant patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol (1989) 36, 637–8.

Todd P,Garioch JJ, Rademaker M, Thomson J. Nicardipine interacts with cyclosporin. Br J Dermatol (1989) 121, 820.

Bouquet S,Chapelle G, Barrier L, Boutaud P, Menu P, Courtois P Interactions ciclosporinenicardipine chez un transplanté cardiaque, adaptation posologique. J Pharm Clin (1992) 11,

59.

Mabin D,Fourquet I, Richard P, Esnault S, Islam MS, Bourbigot B. Leucoencéphalopathierégressive au cours d’un surdosage en cyclosporine A. Rev Neurol (Paris) (1993) 149, 576–8.

McNally P,Mistry N, Idle J, Walls J, Feehally J. Calcium channel blockers and cyclosporinemetabolism. Transplantation (1989) 48, 1071.

Rossi SJ,Hariharan S, Schroeder TJ, First MR. Cyclosporine dosing and blood levels in renaltransplants receiving Procardia XL. Clin Pharmacol Ther (1993) 53, 238.

Rossi SJ,Hariharan S, Schroeder TJ, First MR. Cyclosporine dosing and blood levels in renaltransplant recipients receiving Procardia XL. J Am Soc Nephrol (1992) 3, 877.

Ogborn MR,Crocker JFS, Grimm PC. Nifedipine, verapamil and cyclosporin A pharmacokinetics in children. Pediatr Nephrol (1989) 3, 314–16.

Propper DJ,Whiting PH, Power DA, Edward N, Catto GRD. The effect of nifedipine on graftfunction in renal allograft recipients treated with cyclosporin A. Clin Nephrol (1989) 32, 62–

7.

Howard RL,Shapiro JI, Babcock S, Chan L. The effect of calcium channel blockers on thecyclosporine dose requirement in renal transplant recipients. Ren Fail (1990) 12, 89–92.

Feehally J,Walls J, Mistry N, Horsburgh T, Taylor J, Veitch PS, Bell PRF. Does nifedipineameliorate cyclosporin A nephrotoxicity? BMJ (1987) 295, 310.

Morales JM,Andrés A, Alvarez C, Prieto C, Ortuño B, Ortuño T, Paternina ER, Hernandez Poblete G, Praga M, Ruilope LM, Rodicio JL. Calcium channel blockers and early cyclosporine nephrotoxicity after renal transplantation: a prospective randomized study. Transplant Proc (1990) 22, 1733–5.

McFadden JP,Pontin JE, Powles AV, Fry L, Idle JR. Cyclosporin decreases nifedipine metabolism. BMJ (1989) 299, 1224.

Thomason JM,Seymour RA, Rice N. The prevalence and severity of cyclosporin and nifedipine-induced gingival overgrowth. J Clin Periodontol (1993) 20, 37–40.

Jackson C,Babich S. Gingival hyperplasia: interaction between cyclosporin A and nifedipine? A case report. N Y State Dent J (1997) 63, 46–8.

Thomason JM,Ellis JS, Kelly PJ, Seymour RA. Nifedipine pharmacological variables as riskfactors for gingival overgrowth in organ-transplant patients. Clin Oral Investig (1997) 1, 35–

9.

Morgan JDT,Swarbrick MJ, Edwards CM, Donnelly PK. Cyclosporin, nifedipine and gingival hyperplasia: a randomized controlled study. Transpl Int (1994) 7 (Suppl 1), S320–S321.

Vescovi P,Meleti M, Manfredi M, Merigo E, Pedrazzi G. Cyclosporin-induced gingivalovergrowth: a clinical-epidemiological evaluation of 121 Italian renal transplant recipients. J Periodontol (2005) 76, 1259–63.

Fourtounas C,Kopelias I, Kiriaki D, Agroyannis B. Increased cyclosporine blood levels afternisoldipine administration in a renal transplant recipient. Transpl Int (2002) 15, 586–8.

Çopur MS,Tasdemir I, Turgan Ç, Yasavul Ü, Çaglar S. Effects of nitrendipine on blood pressure and blood ciclosporin A level in patients with posttransplant hypertension. Nephron (1989) 52, 227–30.

Dawidson I,Rooth P, Fry WR, Sandor Z, Willms C, Coorpender L, Alway C, Reisch J. Prevention of acute cyclosporine-induced renal blood flow inhibition and improved immunosuppression with verapamil. Transplantation (1989) 48, 575–80.

Lindholm A,Henricsson S. Verapamil inhibits cyclosporin metabolism. Lancet (1987) i, 1262–3.

Hampton EM,Stewart CF, Herrod HG, Valenski WR. Augmentation of in-vitro immunosuppressive effects of cyclosporin by verapamil. Clin Pharmacol Ther (1987) 41, 169.

Robson RA,Fraenkel M, Barratt LJ, Birkett DJ. Cyclosporin-verapamil interaction. Br J Clin Pharmacol (1988) 25, 402–3.

Angermann CE,Spes CH, Anthuber M, Kemkes BM, Theisen K. Verapamil increases cyclosporin-A blood trough levels in cardiac recipients. J Am Coll Cardiol (1988) 11, 206A.

Sabaté I,Griñó JM, Castelao AM, Ortolá J. Evaluation of cyclosporin-verapamil interaction,with observations on parent cyclosporin and metabolites. Clin Chem (1988) 34, 2151.

Cebeci I,Kantarci A, Firatli E, Çarin M, Tuncer Ö. The effect of verapamil on the prevalenceand severity of cyclosporine-induced gingival overgrowth in renal allograft recipients. J Periodontol (1996) 67, 1201–5.

Oppenheimer F,Alcaraz A, Mañalich M, Ricart MJ, Vilardell J, Campistol JM, Andreu J,Talbot-Wright R, Fernandez-Cruz L. Influence of the calcium blocker diltiazem on the prevention of acute renal failure after renal transplantation. Transplant Proc (1992) 24, 50–1.

Wagner K,Henkel M, Heinemeyer G, Neumayer H-H. Interaction of calcium blockers andcyclosporine. Transplant Proc (1988) 20 (Suppl 2), 561–8.

Smith CL,Hampton EM, Pederson JA, Pennington LR, Bourne DWA. Clinical and medicoeconomic impact of the cyclosporine-diltiazem interaction in renal transplant recipients.Pharmacotherapy (1994) 14, 471–81.

Iqbal S,Holland D, Toffelmire EB. Diltiazem inhibition of cyclosporin metabolism providescost effective therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther (1995) 57, 219.

Cooke CE. Nontherapeutic cyclosporine levels. Sustained-release diltiazem products are notthe same. Transplantation (1994) 57,1687.

Neoral (Ciclosporin). Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd. UK Summary of product characteristics,December 2004.